MeanMrMustard
Adam could have wondered the garden, blissfully and innocently raping lions and goats, with his wife, and neither of them would be able to even begin to grasp why that be wrong. Those actions would hold the same moral weight as eating from the tree of knowledge of good and bad.
The original sin story leaves a lot of questions that are difficult to answer:
What did Eve think she would gain by eating the fruit- what was in it for her?
As mustard eloquently points out - why risk a perfectly happy life, raping lions, goats- or anything else that crossed your path?
Non-human members of the animal kingdom do not know right from wrong. A male lion doesnt feel bad about killing his own offspring. Many animals are cannibalisitic. Dogs hump our legs. Is that the normal state of the human condition that god intended?
If adam had eaten eve- how was he to know it was wrong? Was that a better alternative than eating the fruit? How could god NOT forgive him?
Was the only reason that eve ate the fruit was because she wanted the 'wisdom' to distinguish between good and bad?
Did Adam or Eve understand the full consequences of their actions and how it would affect their descendants?
Did they understand that not only would they die, but that god was going to prevent access to the tree of life and curse them too?
Were they destined to die anyway- without eating from the tree of life?
If the serpent was the original liar- heres an idea: why not just kill the freakin snake and save us all some trouble??!!